'; ?>
Is Crean running for leader? |
Is Simon Crean positioning himself for a leadership challenge? Today's Australian carries the story "Simon Crean to fight plan for superannuation tax changes as internal rift deepens". While it is unclear exactly what he intends to do, it is clear that now he is on the backbench he is prepared to destabilise the government over issues that matter. Superannuation is a good issue to pick. According to our polling it is the last area that voters would like to see a tax increase.
This table, drawn from an adjusted sample of 1,266 voters in January, shows community acceptance of higher taxes in 7 areas (including a classification of "other") and is calculated by adding together the scores for the top three choices. The MRRT is the top most popular area for an increase, followed by capital gains tax and company tax. Even the GST has 42% support. Taxing superannuation comes in stone motherless last at 14% - only a third of this. The Australian asks him whether he would cross the floor to oppose changes. This seems very unlikely, as unless there was a conscience vote that would lead to him being expelled from Labor. The alternative would be a backbench revolt. But what would be the point of that? On Crean's own account the government is deeply mired in bad policy. How many revolts would he need to lead, and how long could the current leadership survive that? Even if none of his revolts succeeds the added perception of disunity will keep driving nails into the government's election prospects. And if the current leadership falls, who would replace it, now that Kevin Rudd definitely seems to be out of contention? Perhaps the Rudd ambition is still present and Crean is playing a similar role to that of Kevin Andrews whose quixotic challenge to Malcolm Turnbull's leadership opened the door to Abbott's ultimately successful challenge. Or perhaps some have decided that the almost certain loss in this year's election ought to be handed to someone who can handle it, and whose career can take another battering, and that could just be Simon Crean. Again, our polling shows that Crean would be a credible leader, and the only credible leader who is in the latter stages of his parliamentary career where the prospect of being a long term leader has most likely evaded them.
While Smith is the outright favourite (and has been since we started polling federal leaderships) and Combet is next, Crean comes in third place, statistically tied with Kevin Rudd, and ahead of Shorten and the Prime Minister. You wouldn't be sacrificing the future, or his own, if you selected Simon Crean. And he might just be able to pull things together enough to stem the slaughter that faces Labor under current settings. Labor isn't playing to win the next election. At the moment they are seeking to turn the next election from a pure disaster into a mitigated one. Not much of a difference, but it could shorten the time to rebuild and win another election by a term or two.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
What's the difference between Juliar and Abbott's equivocation
We need a new party that truely represents the people.
Our vote does not decide what is the best solution.
We elect representatives to negotiate the best solution.
It's time to elect our Governor-Genera l to do this.
RSS feed for comments to this post