'; ?> Julia Gillard and the AWU | What The People Want
Julia Gillard and the AWU
Thursday, 13 December 2012 09:13 | Written by Graham Young

Almost fifty per cent of Australians disapprove of Julia Gillard's involvement in the AWU scandal and only eleven per cent approve, but more than fifty per cent disagree with the Opposition's pursuit of the issue. I've tried to explain the paradox at On Line Opinion in "Gillard was wrong, but we don't care". This post contains the quantitative figures.

And the quants show that no-one comes out of the affair with distinction.

The first table summarises what you can find in more detail in the following tables.


Summary Table

Thinking about what you know of the Prime Minister Julia Gillard's involvement in the AWU matter, how strongly do you approve or disapprove of the actions that she carried out back in the early 1990s?

Gillard Slush Fund
Thinking about the AWU matter again, how strongly do you approve or disapprove of the Opposition's pursuit now of this matter? 

Opposition Slush Fund

Thinking about the AWU matter again, how strongly do you approve or disapprove of the Government's defence of the Prime Minister Julia Gillard over this matter?

 

Government Slush Fund

Thinking about the AWU matter again, how strongly do you agree or disagree with Senator George Brandis’ claim in the Senate that there was “a criminal in the Lodge”?

Brandis Slush Fund 


 Thinking about the AWU matter again how likely are you to change your vote from last election because of it?

Change Vote Slush Fund
 Voters who have changed their vote from Lib to Labor or Labor to Lib since last election.Thinking about the AWU matter again how likely are you to change your vote from last election because of it?

 Swingers Vote Slush Fund

 

Share this article on your favourite social bookmarking sites:
Digg! Reddit! Del.icio.us! Google! Facebook! StumbleUpon! Twitter!
 

Comments   

 
-1 #21 RE: Julia Gillard and the AWU — Kathryn 2013-03-04 12:12
I am heartily sick of everyone calling Julia Gillard a liar when the Mother and Father of all liars is none other than the bible bashing Abbott. Don't believe me? Read this:

Watch it!

jameswight.wordpress.com/.../. ..

thepoliticalsword.com/.../...


tony2012.com.au/
 
 
+1 #22 RE: Julia Gillard and the AWU — Ted 2013-03-04 13:44
Kathryn, your bigotry is showing. As is that of your sources.

Just one standout example. Tony Abbott supported the AGW policies when the evidence seemed to indicate that AGW was happening. That was a long time ago now.

He changed his policy when the failure of the incoming data to support the hypothesis had gone on for too long to ignore.

Still in 2013 the incoming data do not support the AGW hypothesis. So much so that even the IPCC are having second thoughts.

The only data which do are synthetic data. Clearly the synthesis is flawed. Despite many billions of dollars spent over 25 years to find it, there is in 2013 no evidence which links visible global warming to CO2 emissions.

He was right to change this policy.
 
 
0 #23 RE: Julia Gillard and the AWU — Snowy 2013-03-04 13:58
Ted,

Unlike you, Kathryn supplies links to substantiate her claims. When you can supply authoritatve sources to substantiate your claims then you may be entitled to some credibility. And no, Andrew Bolt and Alan Jones are not authoritative sources. Try NASA, CSIRO, BOM, all Academies of Sciences around the world, and Royal Society for starters.
 
 
+1 #24 RE: Julia Gillard and the AWU — Ted 2013-03-06 20:43
Snowy, you haven't been paying attention.

In recent months even some of the most diehard AGW protagonists and the IPCC have joined the ranks of those who have recognised that for 15 years or more there has been no significant warming.

They recognise that their "precautionary principle" no longer dictates urgency for the measures they had been demanding. The link with rising CO2 levels, which 15 years ago seemed so secure, is broken. More data is needed.

The CSIRO and the BOM, being deep in the pockets of the ALP, are yet to acknowledge this.

As for Kathryn's "sources". They are bigots engrossed in the promotion of Marxism. Kathryn has fallen for their lies.
 
 
0 #25 RE: Julia Gillard and the AWU — Snowy 2013-03-06 22:27
Ted,

Still no links to substantiate your wild claims. Enough said.
 
 
0 #26 Cheap Nike NFL Jerseys Sale,Wholesale Jerseys,Faster Shipping and No Other Fee — cheap jerseys 2013-06-08 00:11
Wholesale Jerseys,nike nfl jerseys from china,NIKE Jerseys 2012 , mlb Jerseys sale,Jerseys for Sale Cheap,Wholesale NFL Jerseys,NFL Football Jerseys sale, cheap Snapbacks Caps,cheap MLB Monster Beats ,nfl jerseys store online