'; ?>
Australians look for third alternative |
Some of the responses to our "People Power" survey seemed to think that the Gillard government lacked legitimacy and that one of the reasons for this was the way in which Kevin Rudd was removed as Prime Minister, so we decided to resurvey respondents and see just what views respondents had of the contest and where they saw Labor party leadership heading. On most issues there isn't a lot of agreement, apart from the proposition that the ALP needs a third alternative.
The following analysis is based on a sample weighted to reflect voting preference of the community at large. The caucus vote didn't improve the situation for Julia Gillard. Her win made people less likely to vote Labor. It seems that the prospect of Kevin Rudd winning lifted Labor's vote (which probably explains the last Newspoll result). Thinking about the result of the Labor leadership ballot are you now more or less likely to vote Labor?
There is certainly a strong moral feeling against Rudd's original removal on the basis that it was unjust: What happened to Kevin Rudd when he was removed as Prime Minister in 2010 was unjust.
Although there was not strong agreement that it required any sort of closure, with the sample evenly split. This 2012 ALP leadership ballot was necessary to give closure to the removal of Kevin Rudd as Prime Minister in 2010.
Some Labor figures were suggesting that Julia Gillard looked stronger as a result of the contest. While a significant number of respondents thought this was the case, even more thought it wasn't. Julia Gillard has come out of this contest looking stronger.
I actually thought it personally made her look more human and that her delivery at press conferences had improved. This was not a majority view. Julia Gillard has come out of this contest looking more human.
In fact almost a majority is looking forward to Gillard being challenged again. The ballot has solved nothing. This should be the end of challenges to Julia Gillard from within the Labor Party in this term of government.
Despite what he says, a plurality believes Rudd will likely challenge again. Kevin Rudd is to be believed when he says that he will not initiate a challenge against Julia Gillard.
And on balance believe he should challenge again. Kevin Rudd may need to be prepared to be part of a challenge to Julia Gillard during this term of government.
But they would prefer neither Gillard nor Rudd. If there is another leadership ballot this term the ALP needs a third person to contest it.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
But with either of them in charge, they are more likely to get voted out, so I think we should keep the grossly unpopular Ju-liar in the top job.
In any case I strongly suspect that Bill Shorten will soon be elevated to the leadership position.
A few days ago, we were told that the government needs to bring in another 138,000 foreign workers to fill the shortfall in the service industries (waitresses, bar people, cleaners etc).
Then more recently Senator Evans said we needed our young people to get a degree (or at least a Certificate III from VET) because there won't be any work in the service industries.
This is just another case of the Slave Labor Party failing to pay a decent wage to Aussies, thereby driving them out of the service industries, then inciting racial and religious tensions, and driving those who would boost our Age Pyramid back out of the country.
Thanks for being transparent with the polls.
Venice from meuble banc TV
RSS feed for comments to this post