'; ?>
Qualitative polling on Victorian election |
We conducted qualitative polling of voters in the Victorian election last week. The full report can be downloaded by clicking here. The odds are that Labor will win the Victorian election, but there is a narrow gate through which the Liberal Nationals could pass to government, or the Greens to a role in supporting a minority Labor government. There is no enthusiasm for a Labor win, but a major reason stopping the pendulum swinging back to the Liberal Nationals is a lack of enthusiasm for Matthew Guy, the opposition leader. Our sample was small for this election, largely because of a low response rate from Liberals. When constructing a virtual focus group we need respondents to be close to the proportions that they represent in the community. With only 39 out of 267 respondents being Liberals in the first instance, it meant we had to randomly match them from the rest of the initial group to get the size of the focus group down to 100 (making them 39% of the sample, which is what Newspoll says their first preference vote is). This is an indictment of Guy. While Liberals are generally under-represented in our initial responses I don’t recall it ever being as low as 15% before. The result of this is that while only 50% of voters think the government deserves to be re-elected or want it to be, 72% expect that it will be. Which is where the narrow gate opens for the Liberal Nationals, or Greens. There are enough issues where Andrews has annoyed voters – for example crime and safe schools – for voters to want to protest. In inner city seats the Greens are a likely recipient of protest votes, while in outer suburban seats, it is the LNP. However voters will not use a party for a protest vote, unless they think it is worthy of that protest vote. The Greens regularly score protest voters, but do the Liberals stack up? While Guy is not well-liked, he is not despised, although he is suspected. He has a reputation for shadiness, earned through the controversial rezoning of Fishermans Bend he approved as planning minister in the previous Liberal government; and a celebrated fundraising lunch he attended along with an alleged crime figure. But Daniels also looks shady. The Red Shirt affair, where Labor used government resources for campaigning, and now refuses to cooperate with the investigators, is a low point in state governance. And there is his perceived pandering to the unions. So in terms of character they are more or less even. But the Liberals have a performance deficit against Labor. When respondents were asked whether the Opposition had done enough to deserve to win government, only 29% agreed. Crucially around one-fifth of Liberal voters didn’t think the opposition deserves to win. In terms of protest votes this isn’t fatal, because the aim of a protestor is to change the behaviour of the party they believe will be elected by voting for the party they believe won’t be. It’s a little counterintuitive, but lacklustre performance by Oppositions can help them to win in these circumstances, as long as it’s not too lacklustre. While the Liberals are distinguishing themselves from Labor on crime, environmental and sustainability issues are playing a large part in this election. Climate change is a big issue, along with urban congestion. Both issues find expression through the centre-piece transport infrastructure projects of both sides. The Suburban Train Loop of Daniel Andrews, with a completion date in 2050, which will move people around the outskirts of Melbourne, versus the East West and North East road tunnels to be completed sooner, that will move cars around the outskirts of Melbourne. There are also cultural issues bubbling under the surface – mainly union links and suspicions of social engineering. These may have more effect in outer suburban and regional seats, than in the inner city, and they are a driver of the One Nation vote, which is unusually high for Victoria. With so much disillusion with the major parties it is theoretically possible that minor parties and independents will do well. This didn’t show up in our sample, with a number of respondents expressing a preference for parties that can actually implement their own agenda. Specific findings are:
The full report can be downloaded by clicking here. |
Comments
RSS feed for comments to this post