'; ?>
October Omnibus quants. |
While Julia Gillard apparently has a lead over Tony Abbott in the approval and preferred PM stakes, that doesn't hold true on our sample where popularity is more or less even. However, there is a strong deficit on the question of whether the country is heading in the right direction, reputedly a predictor of whether the government can win an election or not. Thinking about Australia would you agree or disagree that the country is heading in the right direction?
Thinking about Julia Gillard as Prime Minister, how strongly do you approve or disapprove of the job that she is doing?
Thinking about Tony Abbott as Leader of the Opposition, how strongly do you approve or disapprove of the job that he is doing?
Who is your preferred Prime Minister?
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Comments
If the other mob got in, we would continue in ever decreasing circles, but in the opposite direction.
Both sides, and leaders, really are an embarrassment.
cartoonmick.wordpress.com/.../ ...
Cheers
Mick
I'd break this into two sentences.eg Thinking about Australia,we are headed in the right direction. Agree or disagree.
The only options left for Labor is lots of bribes at the next election for which we will take on more debt.
At least 35% of the public are totally ignorant of economic realities.They seem to make no connection between the taxes they pay and the debt our Govt takes on.That is the sad and frustrating fact and our pollies know it.
It is a matter of the lesser of two evils and unless we become more aware and pro-active,our pollies too, will bring in austerity to appease the elites who rule us.They want us in more debt so we become like Greece.
It is the same in the USA.There is very little difference between Obama and Romney.They are backing Romney now because he is more likely to appease Israel and attack Iran.
I also hear people combining the debt Australia owes, and the coming so called Budget Surplus. They think that if we have a surplus next May the billions of dollars we owe will have been paid off !!!!!!!
Malcolm Turnbull might be a successful business man and appear "regal" BUT from a political point of view he has been rather naive. From what I hear, he hadn't learnt how to work the party room. Remember the Godwin Grech fiasco? Also he would NEVER have been able to stand up to Labor which Tony Abbott has done most successfully.
It just does not seem that way to me at all. I see and ordinary Aussie guy, sport mad, charitable and decent.
Perhaps it is the liberal idea that the primary unit of concern should be the individual rather than the "collective" that upsets people.
Democracy, freedom of speech and, to the maximum extent compatible with the absence of anarchy, freedom of action are, for me, appropriate social ideals.
Gillard is far more extreme in her views than is Abbott - being not only collectivist (which is fair enough for a Labor person) but also seeming to have fully internalised the other Fabian touchstone that the (self-defined) "intellectual elite" should herd and control the rest of us ... for our own good (presumably). I couldn't bring myself to vote knowingly for the arrogant pseudo-intellec tual wannabe-dictato rs.
RSS feed for comments to this post